Comments on Eirik Solheim's Blog

As a matter of principle I think that photos taken from the Internet for publication should be attributed to the photographer who took the photo. Or, the organization or individual using other's photo should at the very least ask for permission to use the photo. Solheim appears to have an interest in photography and media laws which predisposes him to battle companies and individuals who take advantage of individual photographers. His blog reveals this combative nature. He was willing to hire expensive lawyers to pursue his case. He is ensuring that "huge amounts of people" join in his sentiments of "hate" for Vinderen Elektriske. To me, it appears that Mrs. Solheim blew the situation out of proportion. A company took his photo and used it without compensating him or attributing him to the photo. Yes, this is a violation of the law and reveals an unethical practice used by the editors of the catalogue. But, my question for Mr. Solheim would be: "Are you really surprised?"
Any time an individual posts photos online he or she risks those photos being used indiscriminately. In our globalized world, we cannot expect the law to protect every piece of property (in this case, photos) we own. We should expect it, but we will often be disappointed by our high expectations. This is the reality of the Internet and technology- lines are easily blurred because of the enormity and infinite nature of the Web. Thus, photos and intellectual property which are essential to individuals (such as a photo of your son) should not be posted online. The Internet has reared an ugly beast, and the only way to counter it is to avoid its pitfalls.

Rachel Fuerst